A federal court in Florida has summoned Alexandre de Moraes, a justice on Brazil’s Supreme Court, after two American tech companies accused him of censorship.

Trump Media & Technology Group and Rumble claim Moraes ordered them to remove accounts of right-wing Brazilian influencers, which they argue violates the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

The Florida court gave Moraes 21 days to respond, or it may rule against him. Previous attempts to notify him failed, but this time the summons includes his full address.

The companies say Moraes’ orders hurt their business by damaging their reputation and cutting revenue. They want the U.S. court to declare these orders unenforceable in America and to award them financial damages.

This dispute comes as Brazil’s political climate remains tense. Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s former president, faces trial for alleged coup plotting, with Moraes overseeing the case.

U.S. Tech Firms Challenge Brazilian Judge’s Censorship Orders in Florida Court. (Photo Internet reproduction)

Bolsonaro’s son, Eduardo, now lives in the U.S. and is under investigation in Brazil for his actions abroad. The case highlights a key business issue: Can a foreign judge force American companies to censor content for users in the U.S.?

The answer could set a precedent for how tech firms handle government takedown requests from other countries. If the court sides with the companies, U.S. platforms may gain more freedom to resist foreign censorship.

If not, tech firms could face growing pressure to follow other countries’ speech laws. This legal fight shows how international politics and business interests are intersecting.

It also highlights how online speech rights are colliding in the digital age. The outcome could shape how companies, governments, and users interact on global platforms.