Language Selection

Get healthy now with MedBeds!
Click here to book your session

Protect your whole family with Orgo-Life® Quantum MedBed Energy Technology® devices.

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

Supreme Court stays Senthilbalaji’s arrest in TASMAC corruption case

6 days ago 3

PROTECT YOURSELF with Orgo-Life® QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY

Orgo-Life the new way to the future

  Advertising by Adpathway

File image of V. Senthilbalaji.

File image of V. Senthilbalaji. | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court on Friday (July 31, 2026) directed the stay of arrest of former Tamil Nadu Prohibition, Electricity and Excise Minister, V. Senthilbalaji, in a corruption case registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) on July 28.

Earlier in the morning Justice V. Mohana recused herself from the hearing. At 1 p.m., a Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi sat separately to hear Mr. Senthilbalaji’s appeal against a Madras High Court decision to refuse him anticipatory bail.

The apex court Bench said with the change in government in Tamil Nadu, there was no cause of worry for the State that Mr. Senthilbalaji would influence the trajectory of the investigation. Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Mukul Rohatgi and Amit Anand Tiwari, for Mr. Senthilbalaji, said their client would full cooperate with the investigation. Senior advocates Guru Krishnakumar and Siddharth Dave said Mr. Senthilbalaji had a history of influencing and delaying cases whether or not he was in power or not. Justice Bagchi said the State should not be afraid of such things, and said there was no chance of the former Minister absconding while on bail.

The Bench directed Senthilbalaji to deposit his passport, and issued notice to the State of Tamil Nadu.

A day ago, Magras HC’s Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan had dismissed Mr. Senthilbalaji’s advance bail petition after observing that the case relates to the charge of having caused a loss of crores of rupees to the public exchequer when he was a Minister and therefore, it required custodial interrogation.

Opposing the plea, State Public Prosecutor R. John Sathyan said that the loss to the public exchequer appeared to be at least ₹100 crore and that the entire crime could be unearthed only through the investigation of the case and by subjecting the accused to interrogation.

Published - July 31, 2026 12:12 pm IST

Read Entire Article

         

        

Start the new Vibrations with a Medbed Franchise today!  

Protect your whole family with Quantum Orgo-Life® devices

  Advertising by Adpathway