PROTECT YOURSELF with Orgo-Life® QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY
Orgo-Life the new way to the future Advertising by AdpathwaySylvia Earle goes by several titles: oceanographer, explorer, pioneer. She was one of the first people ever to go scuba diving to gather scientific observations.
Earle still uses scuba, “but I’ve also had a chance to live underwater 10 times, to actually be a part of the ocean.”
Spending extensive time underwater became a hallmark of her seven-decade career. Over that time, she discovered a new plant species off the southeast coast of Africa, led the all-women team on the historic Tektite II project, living 50 feet underwater for two weeks, and earned the women’s record for the deepest untethered sea walk, a feat that led her to yet another title: Her Deepness.
Sylvia Earle said she isn’t sure she’s earned this title, but she’s “certainly had the privilege of spending thousands of hours simply diving as a scientist.”

Dr. Merrill True, aquanaut, presents the five-women team of aquanauts with a rum-filled pineapple after they left the decompression chamber off St. John Island in the US Virgin Islands, ending their two-week Tektite II mission 50 feet deep in Great Lameshur Bay, July 21, 1970. From left: Peggy Lucas, Alina Szmant, group leader Dr. Sylvia Earle, Dr. Renate True (wife of Merrill) and Ann Hartline.Jim Bourdier/AP File Photo
Those thousands of hours underwater have resulted in more than 200 research publications, including a landmark study on algae that defined the field for decades. In the 1990s, she was the first woman to serve as chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, and since then she’s led innovation on the technical side of the field.
“I’ve used more than 30 different kinds of submarines to be able to go down deeper,” Earle mentioned. “I’ve worked with engineers to create some remotely operated systems and also submersibles that can take anybody to see our planet from the inside out.”
The World’s Host Carolyn Beeler recently asked Sylvia Earle what continues to drive her passion for the ocean.
“Most of the ocean has yet to be seen by anybody — 0.001% has been seen,” Earle said. “So, there’s this vast, beautiful, sparkling ocean wilderness full of creatures that mostly we have yet to meet, let alone know who they are and how they fit into the greater scheme of making Earth habitable.”
Carolyn Beeler: I understand that you were drawn to the ocean from quite a young age. Do you remember if there was a specific moment in your early life where that spark was ignited?
Sylvia Earle: The first time I met the ocean, I got knocked over by a wave, and I got tumbled around a little bit, but when my toes touched the bottom, my head came out of the water and I could breathe, I realized, “That was fun.” And so, the ocean really did get my attention. But what has held it and still excites me every time I get into the ocean, it’s life. Knowing that the ocean itself, the water, is filled with life, that we’re just beginning to have the capacity to see the microscopic life that is swimming around in what seems like clear water.
I understand it was around when you were in college that you had your first scuba dive.
Yes. 1953.
When scuba technology was still relatively new, can you tell us what that first dive was like, if there’s a particular image or a particular feeling that you still remember?
The delight of actually being able to breathe underwater. It’s so counterintuitive, but it seems miraculous. And then you just quickly, at least for me, you accept that and then you start moving around and realize you can stay there and get acquainted with the creatures who are there. Fish want to see, “Who are you? What are you doing here?” And even the big creatures like sea lions, seals, whales, they’ll come over, check you out. It’s kind of unnerving sometimes.

The five women aquanauts in the Tektite II Project stand beside the Great Lameshur Bay on St. John, the Virgin Islands on July 6, 1970, where they will start experiment on Monday. From left are: Dr. Renate True, Aline Szmant, Dr. Sylvia Earle Meade, the group’s leader; Ann Hartline and Peggy Lucas. Jim Bourdier/AP File Photo
But fascinating, I’m sure. You go down into the ocean not as a tourist, but with a mission. You’re a researcher, a writer, a speaker, and you have been doing all those things in ocean work since that very first dive. This is a big question, but I hope to have you tell us, how has the ocean changed from that day of your very first dive until now?
I can try. I can say that we have learned more since the middle of the 20th century. We’ve learned more because we have technology to go deep in the sea. But during the same period of time, again, it’s technology that has enabled us to consume nature on a scale that is unprecedented. Half the coral reefs are gone. Albatrosses and other seabirds are down to a fraction of their numbers when I started diving. Some of the estimates are about half of the life that was there. Think tunas. Think cod. Think swordfish. Think sharks. We’ve been able, using technology, to find, capture, kill.
In the process of capturing, say, tuna, you capture a host of other creatures, like dolphins, that are captured right along with those that are going to market. They call this bycatch. It’s legal. It’s recognized that it’s okay to kill a lot of things in the process of taking those that we want to take to market. So the question is, “Where is this taking us? What does the extraction of whales mean to the carbon cycle, to the chemistry of the planet?” You’ve disrupted the natural systems that make Earth habitable. It just — we’ve been chopping away not just trees on land, but chopping away at life in the ocean. We need nature, but now nature needs us.
Sylvia, as I mentioned, you spent the first part of your career dedicated to studying and exploring the ocean and eventually became the first female chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In the past decades, though, you have been more focused on advocacy and marine protections. And related to what we were just talking about, what sparked that shift? Was it that realization of everything we, as humans, were doing to the oceans?
I don’t think of myself as an advocate. I think of myself as a messenger. I get to see things that others have not. And you can’t care if you don’t know. That’s my role, I think, to try to share the view. Now, not everybody knows what is there to be known, but the knowledge is not only there, but more accessible. Kids can carry computers in their pockets, talk to others, access information to the point where knowledge becomes universal, available, and at a time when we still have an opportunity, and we can do something about it.
You mentioned that knowledge about the oceans is a lot more accessible than it used to be, and more people have a better understanding of how important they are to us, although, of course, that’s not a complete understanding. Where else are you seeing bright spots? Where else are you seeing momentum for ocean protection, which is something you work on a lot now?
Great, good news. Last year, the so-called High Seas Treaty, it got enough nations to sign up to bring it into effect, to legally commit nations to protection of at least 30% safeguarded — a high level of protection. It’s a big order because, right now, high protection for the ocean applies to only about 3%. So, we have to really put on the afterburners to get 10 times more protected at the scale that is needed to really seriously reverse some of the trends that we are now experiencing, the planetary boundaries that we are transgressing through consuming or transforming nature for human purposes, everything from excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to acidification of the ocean that is directly connected to that.
Knowing the plastics, these innovative materials that didn’t exist when I was a child, now they’re everywhere, including in the air we breathe, the water we drink, in our bodies, and certainly in the ocean. This avalanche of, not just plastics, but other synthetic materials and changing the chemistry of the planet is probably not a smart thing to do. But we didn’t know. I am a part of the group called the Planetary Guardians that works with the scientists about the harm we have already generated. But this being the best chance we will ever have, to take what we now know, we’re not just empty guessing. We have evidence that reducing fossil fuels, there can be favorable consequences.

On Dec. 19, 2016, Dr. Sylvia Earle stands beside a full-size mock-up of the Deep Water 2000 submersible at Deep Ocean Exploration and Research Marine in Alameda, Calif. Former NOAA chief scientist and founder of ocean advocacy group Mission Blue Earle said there are more environmentally sustainable and economically viable options than open-ocean aquaculture, which uses huge floating net-pens or submerged cages.Ben Margot/AP
You have worked tirelessly on the oceans for decades, as we have said, and you speak with some amount of optimism about our ability to change their trajectory. But right now, climate change is making ocean acidification worse. The plastics you were just talking about continue to flow into the oceans by the millions of tons every year. Biodiversity is being lost. How do you continue to forge ahead with your work and not become dispirited when the metrics don’t look so great?
Well, I think it’s starting with what I began with. We live in a time when we’re the beneficiaries of all preceding human knowledge, but never before the last half century or so has there been this rate of accelerated learning and knowledge. We’ve learned more in my lifetime at the same time that we have lost more than at any other time in history. And it’s the knowing that leads to caring, that leads to action. It’s, we know what to do. And while we continue to live our lives and continue basically what we’ve been doing, can we change? Can we find ways to inspire people to feel the privilege of being a 21st-century human being? We could not know, before the technology that now exists gave us the knowledge that we’re in trouble, but it’s not too late.
Parts of this interview have been lightly edited for length and clarity.





















English (US) ·
French (CA) ·
French (FR) ·