PROTECT YOURSELF with Orgo-Life® QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY
Orgo-Life the new way to the future Advertising by AdpathwayLast Updated:March 13, 2026, 12:19 IST
Hearing the plea, CJI Kant raised concerns about the potential social consequences of mandating menstrual leave through legislation.

Supreme Court of India (File photo)
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a PIL seeking a nationwide policy providing menstrual leave for women students and employees. Hearing the matter, the top court observed that no one would give female workers jobs in such a scenario and that such a provision would unintentionally reinforce gender stereotypes.
However, the apex court added that the competent authority may consider the representation and examine the possibility of framing a policy on menstrual leave after consulting all relevant stakeholders.
“These pleas are made to create fear, to call women inferior, that menstruation is something bad happening to them. This is an affirmative right. But think about the employer who needs to give paid leave," the Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said.
Hearing the plea filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi, CJI Kant raised concerns about the potential social consequences of mandating menstrual leave through legislation.
He observed that such pleas could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about women.
Senior advocate MR Shamshad, appearing for the petitioner, cited the example of Kerala and pointed out that certain states and institutions have already taken steps to accommodate menstrual leave.
He stated that in Kerala, the menstrual cycle relaxation has been introduced in schools, and added that several private companies have voluntarily provided such leave to employees.
Responding to this, the CJI said voluntary policies were welcome but cautioned against making such provisions mandatory through law.
“Voluntarily given is excellent. The moment you say it is compulsory in law, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in the judiciary or government jobs; their career will be over. They will say you should sit at home after informing everyone," the CJI said.
In addition to this, the Bench highlighted the potential impact of such measures on workplace perceptions and the professional growth of women.
(With agency inputs)
First Published:
March 13, 2026, 12:16 IST
News india 'Nobody Will Hire Women': Supreme Court Refuses Plea Seeking Menstrual Leave Policy
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Read More


2 months ago
14






















English (US) ·
French (CA) ·
French (FR) ·