Language Selection

Get healthy now with MedBeds!
Click here to book your session

Protect your whole family with Orgo-Life® Quantum MedBed Energy Technology® devices.

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

An American documentary photographer recalls her day on 9/11

1 month ago 8

PROTECT YOURSELF with Orgo-Life® QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY

Orgo-Life the new way to the future

  Advertising by Adpathway

For one New York resident, Susan Meiselas, it would feel as though the many conflicts she had covered overseas as a documentary photographer had come to roost in her hometown. Not knowing what to expect, she did what she knew best: grabbed her camera and rushed to the scene.

“I remember everybody walking away, walking north as I was going south,” Meiselas told The World. “And the closer I got, it wasn’t just people walking … it was people fleeing in panic.”

Meiselas captured some of the day’s most memorable images. One of them is an illusion. It’s a sculpture of a businessman looking into his briefcase, the Double Check Man, as it’s known, by sculptor John Seward Johnson II. The figure is covered in white dust, but it tricks you into thinking he’s real and in shock.

“I remember all the papers circulating around him. The dust was still falling from the bone dust,” she said. “Later, he’s become a symbol. But at that moment, I think I was just responding to the juxtaposition. It was just so strange.”

The World’s Host Marco Werman met up with Susan Meiselas in New York City last week at the site where she took that photo to speak about that day and what came after.

Marco Werman: You’re talking in very impressionistic images. Take us back to that morning. Where were you, and how did you find out about what was happening at the World Trade Center?

Well, it’s much as it is now. It was the end of the summer. I had a plan to see a friend who had been away, though we’d been in opposite directions, and we were going to meet at 9 o’clock, about a block and a half from my house, in a diner. I got there early, and I remember looking at the little television they had at the diner, and it was reporting on the first plane going into the tower. It seemed like an accident, so I didn’t take much notice. She didn’t show up at 9. And the next thing I saw was the second plane, because it was a live feed. And that’s the moment that I figured whatever was happening, I needed to go. Nobody had the idea yet who had driven the plane in, and no one imagined that the towers were going to fall down, which happened just as I was almost arriving on my bike. The second tower collapsed, and that really created a panic.

How overwhelming was it to try to capture the scale of what had happened at Ground Zero? I mean, how did you kind of try to fit it into your frame?

You are trying to make multiple frames. It’s not all in one frame the way a video camera would work with sound; you know, you’re capturing little fragments. So each day, different parts of the scene revealed themselves. Obviously, as the tower came down, another memorable image for me was what was like a sculpture: the bones of the building that remained. That was very dramatic. And also, you forget that the sky was red.

You know, we didn’t have clear skies for days. You could tell the air was polluted. You didn’t know with what. I mean, I was focused more on my sight. And the sound, which is also just hard to describe. On one hand, very eerily quiet — the way the city has a buzz, but if there’s no traffic, how quiet it gets. You know, you were hearing screeching sounds from every direction — the fire trucks arriving, the emergency vehicles arriving — and people, again, stunned and not knowing where to go, what to do.

Do you think the overwhelming scale of the site kind of prompted you to look at more intimate kinds of spaces like the Double Check Man, or just like people staring?

Well, you can see where I was in relation to the Double Check sculpture, which was sitting within two or three blocks of the towers. So I was circling around the towers, trying to get any perspective I could, any entry point to have another view of what was happening. If you walked half a block in one direction, you’d see a group of men who had just gone into the tower and tried to rescue people who are collapsed on the sidewalk from exhaustion. You know, people’s clothing [was scattered] along the park. I just remember fragments, lots of fragments of what — it’s like a puzzle that you’re putting the little pieces together. We didn’t have the overview, a vision of how much hate there was at that moment, what America represented. I’m somebody who travels the world. I think the biggest shock was seeing the war here when I’ve gone to many wars elsewhere, right?

I was going to ask you about that because I know you said — I’m going to quote you …”The camera is an excuse to be someplace you otherwise don’t belong. It gives me both a point of connection and a point of separation.” Did you feel, in some strange way, that you didn’t belong down here that day, or did it feel different this time because, wow, war, something was happening to the US?

Well, I didn’t think I’d seen it happening to the US. New York usually had been, for the decade before, when I was working in Latin America, the place I came back to rest, recharge and kind of imagine my next place to be. So this was always a kind of place of retreat. And therefore, I think most Americans have the illusion that we’re safe, unlike Europeans who feel very interconnected and exposed depending on where events occur. You know, we’re fairly isolated from it, or we perceive [it that way] and pretend we’re protected. In any case, I think that was part of the shock.

Now, with the 25th anniversary, I’m curious what perspective you’ve gained on the event and what’s changed over the years. It’s a huge question, but, like, what comes to mind?

I think a lot about memory and how many people didn’t live through 9/11. Twenty-five years is enough of a gap for the youth to have no sense of the vulnerability we felt then. And perhaps some part of what American policy has acted differently since then.

I mean, it’s been more than a generation since 9/11. Do you worry that there are people — I mean, something that people talk about all the time — who forget history, and then what? Do you worry that people don’t really understand the legacy of 9/11?

I mean, how do you understand it? Look, we’re sitting here looking at Hank’s Pizza and the Burger King, and people are going about their lives. They’re not thinking about what’s happening in Ukraine, Gaza or Iran … or, you know, the contemporary wars that we’re involved in now. I look at these buildings that have been built, and it’s kind of the magnitude, the resilience of this determined nation to move on, to believe in the future, as most of us hope for. But it’s not a peaceful time. I feel the conflict that unfolded was the beginning of a deep, deep culture of conflict that we have been in now for decades. I mean, it’s not to say there weren’t conflicts before 9/11. It feels to me like a divide in where we are in the world, who we want to be in the world, how we want to see ourselves in the world, the kind of harmony that the world doesn’t have — that maybe I was deluded then, but I thought we were still striving for it then.

For documentary photographers like yourself and for journalists, at the end of the day, so much of it is about just bearing witness. And I wonder: if you hadn’t been in New York, if you’d been on assignment somewhere else, would you have regretted that?

Oh, I think I would have deeply regretted not being here. I mean, I’ve always had a divided, should I be here or should I go there, you know, life. So I felt it was important to be here, to be part of the community I live in, even [though I couldn’t] get into my home because I’m within range, and you had to have credentials on you, which I left my home without. I almost had to beg to get home. I wanted to be part of this experience for sure. But I think photography can only do so much. Being present and contributing to memory is only part of what has to happen. It’s only one layer. And so, of course, when you make exhibitions or books, you have this belief that you can sustain others’ engagement, but it depends on others coming to the reality. You can’t give them the reality. You can give them a framework to think about the reality that surrounds us. It’s strange that photographs still have a role, and those people are either with us or they’re gone.

But the photographs live on. There’s something very strangely eerie about the power photographs can have to trigger us back in time, wherever we were at the time that these events occurred, and whatever we thought we knew as to why they occurred; you know, the photograph still opens up a process. Reflection, and that may be all they can do.

Parts of this conversation have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Read Entire Article

         

        

Start the new Vibrations with a Medbed Franchise today!  

Protect your whole family with Quantum Orgo-Life® devices

  Advertising by Adpathway