Language Selection

Get healthy now with MedBeds!
Click here to book your session

Protect your whole family with Orgo-Life® Quantum MedBed Energy Technology® devices.

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

ACP Vivek Bhagat case: HC refuses urgent hearing on journalist’s arrest protection plea

3 days ago 2

PROTECT YOURSELF with Orgo-Life® QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY

Orgo-Life the new way to the future

  Advertising by Adpathway

 HC refuses urgent hearing on woman journalist’s arrest protection plea

​Delhi HC defers journalist’s arrest protection plea

NEW DELHI: The Delhi high ourt on Thursday declined to urgently list a woman journalist’s plea seeking interim protection from arrest in a case registered under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on a complaint by Delhi Police ACP Vivek Bhagat.The court said it would hear the matter on Friday.The plea was mentioned before a division bench of acting chief justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and justice Sanjay Sharma. The journalist’s counsel sought an urgent hearing on Thursday and requested interim protection from arrest, but the bench declined to take up the matter immediately.

The FIR was registered at Parliament Street police station following a complaint by Bhagat over alleged caste-based humiliation, intimidation and obstruction of official duty during a protest at Buta Singh Roundabout on October 3.According to the FIR, Bhagat, who is posted in the Connaught Place subdivision of New Delhi district, was deployed for law-and-order duty during a protest against the Election Commission of India when the alleged incident took place. He claimed that a journalist made derogatory remarks about his caste identity while referring to his nameplate and appointment as an assistant commissioner of police.

Bhagat stated in his complaint that he belongs to the Scheduled Caste community.

The FIR names Rosy, Gajendra and an unidentified person as accused.The journalist, meanwhile, has accused Bhagat of sexual harassment in connection with the October 3 incident. Her allegations and the claims made in the FIR remain subject to investigation and judicial determination.The FIR invokes Sections 221, 356(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), along with Sections 3(1)(p), 3(1)(q), 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court is scheduled to hear the journalist’s plea for interim protection from arrest on Friday.

Do you think the court should have granted an urgent hearing for the journalist plea?

Yes, it's a serious matterNo, the court's process should be followed

3k+ users shared opinion today

5k+ users already voted today

Share Opinion

Read Entire Article

         

        

Start the new Vibrations with a Medbed Franchise today!  

Protect your whole family with Quantum Orgo-Life® devices

  Advertising by Adpathway